Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 2000-08-29 09:05:36 UTC
> From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>Camtronics
> > I had told Tim that these motors were 150 in-oz motors, (much smaller
> > than his), but this morning I just recieved identification of the
> > motors from the Italian manufacturer, saying that they are 474 in-oz,
> > 90 Volts, 4 Amps!
>
> If this is actually the rating then the major problem is that the
> board just will not support enough voltage to be able to drive thosemotors.
But it works fine with different software. I don't disagree about what you're
saying about the motors, but if different software fixes the problem, then
the software must be the problem. Isn't it?
Matt
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-29 08:53:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Matt Shaver
2000-08-29 09:05:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Jon Elson
2000-08-29 09:13:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Kevin P. Martin
2000-08-29 09:38:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-29 09:38:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Darrell
2000-08-29 10:36:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Matt Shaver
2000-08-29 10:40:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-29 11:05:02 UTC
Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Jon Elson
2000-08-29 12:56:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-08-29 13:23:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)
JanRwl@A...
2000-08-29 17:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps (Me again)