Ball Screws for Bridgeport Copy
Posted by
Hugh Currin
on 2000-09-07 17:50:43 UTC
CNC Crew:
I'm almost convinced my mill is close enough to a Bridgeport to
accept a Bridgeport retro-fit kit. It may take some fitting but I
strongly suspect it will be easier than starting with bare ball
screws and nuts.
So, I've found four rolled thread ball screw retrofit kits. Those
being:
Thomson Saginaw .0005 in/ft $3821.30
Nook/PowerTrac .001 in/ft $1665.00
MicroKinetics .003 in/ft $ 975.00
McMaster Carr .003 in/ft $ 743.00
They seem to get more expensive as accuracy increases, ;-).
I was shocked that McMaster Carr has the lowest cost.
Does anyone know of other suppliers I should contact?
Also, I suspect the lead error is quite consistent along any given
screw. If this is the case it wouldn't be too hard to scale
drawings and/or resulting g-code to minimize this. Particularly
if, as suggested in recent posts, calculations can be done right
in the g-code. A few hours measuring should give a very good
idea what these errors are for a particular installation and see
if they are consistent. Does this seem possible? Has anyone
done this?
For nearly all my work .003"/ft would be just fine. However, it
would be nice to get closer when needed, even if it took more
time and thought.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you.
Hugh
-------------------------------------------
Hugh D. Currin, P.E.
Associate Professor & Chair
Manuf. & Mech. Engineering Technology
Oregon Institute of Technology
Klamath Falls, Oregon USA
currinh@...
541/885-1649
-------------------------------------------
I'm almost convinced my mill is close enough to a Bridgeport to
accept a Bridgeport retro-fit kit. It may take some fitting but I
strongly suspect it will be easier than starting with bare ball
screws and nuts.
So, I've found four rolled thread ball screw retrofit kits. Those
being:
Thomson Saginaw .0005 in/ft $3821.30
Nook/PowerTrac .001 in/ft $1665.00
MicroKinetics .003 in/ft $ 975.00
McMaster Carr .003 in/ft $ 743.00
They seem to get more expensive as accuracy increases, ;-).
I was shocked that McMaster Carr has the lowest cost.
Does anyone know of other suppliers I should contact?
Also, I suspect the lead error is quite consistent along any given
screw. If this is the case it wouldn't be too hard to scale
drawings and/or resulting g-code to minimize this. Particularly
if, as suggested in recent posts, calculations can be done right
in the g-code. A few hours measuring should give a very good
idea what these errors are for a particular installation and see
if they are consistent. Does this seem possible? Has anyone
done this?
For nearly all my work .003"/ft would be just fine. However, it
would be nice to get closer when needed, even if it took more
time and thought.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you.
Hugh
-------------------------------------------
Hugh D. Currin, P.E.
Associate Professor & Chair
Manuf. & Mech. Engineering Technology
Oregon Institute of Technology
Klamath Falls, Oregon USA
currinh@...
541/885-1649
-------------------------------------------
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-09-07 16:52:42 UTC
EMC expressions/Variables was:Re: Re: Re: List of Gcode "flavors"
Hugh Currin
2000-09-07 17:50:43 UTC
Ball Screws for Bridgeport Copy
Hugh Currin
2000-09-27 21:21:38 UTC
Ball Screws for Bridgeport Copy
Hugh Currin
2000-10-01 21:35:15 UTC
Opto Isolation ??
Matt Shaver
2000-10-01 22:17:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto Isolation ??
Jon Elson
2000-10-01 22:20:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto Isolation ??
ballendo@y...
2000-10-01 23:21:26 UTC
re:Re: Opto Isolation ??
Hugh Currin
2000-10-02 21:08:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto Isolation ??
Matt Shaver
2000-10-02 23:10:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Opto Isolation ??