Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-codes The list (incomplete)

Hi Ballendo

It was quiet at work, nothing better to do, just used the tools that were
available. Better that just twiddling thumbs.
I agree that a table format is not the best way of presenting the data - A
database would be better....
Fortunately, most codes appear to be the same for most machine - Canned cycles
and syntax can cause trouble. As most flavours use the same codes for basic
functions, perhaps a database just listing the manufacturer specific codes
would be better ??

Regards, Paul.

> Nice bit?? of work :). Thanks for running with this.
>
> I do think we should get away from the TABLE aspect quickly! It will
> become unwieldy VERY soon. How about each individual gcode list as a
> separate document/post/ webpage? With a descriptive title? Even the
> manufacturers could get behind this? (No, we don't want the
> advertorials, just the codes, sir.)
>
> Certainly this will be easier for the owner of a control who wants to
> add to the info. Multiple posts of the same codes could be cross-
> checked against each other. With due credit given to the originator
> of the information, IF he or she does not want to be anonymous.