Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 2000-09-21 06:15:05 UTC
Dan Dowell wrote:
carry the current version, I think its V6.0 and its usually under $100.
I bought V5 a couple years ago and have found it 'OK'. Not great, but
then for under $100 you rarely get great.
Ive looked at the V6 box a few times, and it does make alot of claims
for good 3D modeling, but I havent yet bought it.
I would not bother to load a very old version and waste any time
learning it when the prices are that low.
ron
>TurboCAD is offering a very old version for free. Most computer stores
> Well I went to the turbo cad and the intellicad sites and they appear to be the same. Any way I tried to download both and cant down load eithor.
> I dont know why it wont work, but it wont work.
>
carry the current version, I think its V6.0 and its usually under $100.
I bought V5 a couple years ago and have found it 'OK'. Not great, but
then for under $100 you rarely get great.
Ive looked at the V6 box a few times, and it does make alot of claims
for good 3D modeling, but I havent yet bought it.
I would not bother to load a very old version and waste any time
learning it when the prices are that low.
ron
Discussion Thread
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 21:38:01 UTC
NO CAD
William Scalione
2000-09-20 21:45:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Matt Shaver
2000-09-20 21:52:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 21:56:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 22:02:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Matt Shaver
2000-09-20 22:23:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Ron Ginger
2000-09-21 06:15:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
Paul Corner
2000-09-21 14:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
JanRwl@A...
2000-09-21 18:17:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD
JanRwl@A...
2000-09-21 18:19:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NO CAD