Re: CNC PRO
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-07-01 12:16:03 UTC
> From: "Matt Shaver" <mshaver@...>Yes, the management of this is no big deal. But, it does make the lookahead
> Calling subprograms by their "O" number. or even a conventional file name,
> probably wouldn't be a big deal to add. For that matter, macros probably
> could be supported too. Even some parametric features... What we need are
> some more programmers, everything else would follow!
more tricky. But, when hand coding some tricky bit of geometry, it would
be real easy to do a section of the path as a subroutine, and then just
shift the reference over and call the subroutine every time it is needed.
I'm doing less of this now, as I've figured out how to make Bobcad/CAM
do the harder stuff graphically.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Dan Mauch
1999-06-30 06:38:13 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Anderson
1999-06-30 06:48:45 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-06-30 07:17:25 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Bill Martin
1999-06-30 20:58:37 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Anderson
1999-06-30 21:24:19 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Elson
1999-06-30 23:34:17 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Matt Shaver
1999-07-01 00:23:25 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Dan Mauch
1999-07-01 06:03:42 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Dan Mauch
1999-07-01 06:02:09 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Anderson
1999-07-01 06:43:27 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Robert N Ash
1999-07-01 08:06:11 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jonty50@x...
1999-07-01 11:03:41 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Elson
1999-07-01 12:16:03 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-01 16:49:07 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Anderson
1999-07-01 17:30:53 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-01 17:38:09 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Anderson
1999-07-01 18:23:41 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Matt Shaver
1999-07-01 21:36:50 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
Jon Elson
1999-07-02 22:17:51 UTC
Re: CNC PRO
jmesh@h...
2001-05-02 09:23:31 UTC
CNC PRO
Rich D.
2001-05-02 15:02:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC PRO
cnc002@a...
2001-05-04 05:48:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC PRO