CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Servo Drive Choice

Posted by Tim Goldstein
on 2000-10-28 14:43:43 UTC
Terry,

With your configuration you should be just fine with the G320. Just remember
to use steppermod not freqmod and crank your cycle_time parameters as low as
they can go and still let the system run. BTW, the difference between the 2
stepper modules is that freqmod was created to more evenly space the pulses
to the driver. The servo driver doesn't care how even they are so there is
no functional difference in this application between the 2 in regard to
accuracy and precision. But, the lower overhead of steppermod will allow you
to crank out more steps per second.

With the setup you are running you should be good to 180 ipm or more!

Tim
[Denver, CO]

> Tim,
> I don't care if you aren't Mariss, I'll take help from anybody 8>)
>
> The computer I'm planning to use is a 266Mhz Pent MMX (same one you
> helped me set up with Linux/EMC). High speed isn't a big issue with
> me, just want it to go to the right place reasonably quickly. My
> ballscrews are 5 tpi, I was thinking 2:1 reduction, but only for the
> sprocket size, I'm not wedded to it.
>
> Sounds like with the slower computer I might be better off using the
> G340's, although you seemed to think it wouldn't matter much when you
> assumed a faster computer?? On the other hand, the encoder count is
> 200/800, which is less counts than you were thinking with your
> example calculation.
> Terry

> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html

Discussion Thread

Terry May 2000-10-28 11:18:43 UTC Gecko Servo Drive Choice Tim Goldstein 2000-10-28 12:05:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko Servo Drive Choice Terry May 2000-10-28 14:07:19 UTC Re: Gecko Servo Drive Choice Tim Goldstein 2000-10-28 14:43:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Servo Drive Choice Terry May 2000-10-30 14:22:53 UTC Re: Gecko Servo Drive Choice