Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
Posted by
wanliker@a...
on 2000-11-02 13:23:22 UTC
In a message dated 11/2/00 2:07:18 PM Mountain Standard Time, KM6VV@...
writes:
<< I've looked at them and the Smithy, and to adding CNC
to one of 'em, so isn't this right on topic?
What say, Bill?
machine.
Although there is another list if you are going to endlessly argue over its
faults.
bill
writes:
<< I've looked at them and the Smithy, and to adding CNC
to one of 'em, so isn't this right on topic?
What say, Bill?
>>Not a problem with me, attack or compliment the CNC possibilities of the
machine.
Although there is another list if you are going to endlessly argue over its
faults.
bill
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-11-01 08:29:24 UTC
Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
JanRwl@A...
2000-11-01 14:48:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
wanliker@a...
2000-11-01 18:29:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
wanliker@a...
2000-11-01 18:34:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
JanRwl@A...
2000-11-01 20:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-02 13:05:43 UTC
Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
wanliker@a...
2000-11-02 13:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off-topic posts to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO