Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-03 23:19:08 UTC
JanRwl@... wrote:
You can buy CDs to save all that download time, however.
There are several GUI systems for it. It is actually quite a bit more sophisticated
than Windows, as it descended from MIT project Athena and other workstation
based projects.
There are DOS emulators (which work well) and several Windows emulators,
which also work quite well, despite no support from Microsoft.
Jon
> In a message dated 03-Nov-00 22:50:27 Central Standard Time,nobody. It is "open source", freely available for download over the net.
> Smoke@... writes:
>
> << LINUX is a vastly more reliable platform than Windows (of ANY version). >>
>
> Hmmm... Who makes LINUX?
You can buy CDs to save all that download time, however.
> I take it that is a color GUI op sys along theNo, it is much more like a basic Unix command line system, in its native mode.
> same lines as Windows?
There are several GUI systems for it. It is actually quite a bit more sophisticated
than Windows, as it descended from MIT project Athena and other workstation
based projects.
> Does it run "over MSDOS", or does it have to have itsIt definitely is its own system, and does not have any DOS hidden inside, anywhere.
> "own" DOS?
There are DOS emulators (which work well) and several Windows emulators,
which also work quite well, despite no support from Microsoft.
> Can one use, say, GWBASIC "in" or "under" LINUX???I guess if you really want to use that antique, it should run in the DOS emulator.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-11-03 16:40:52 UTC
Re: Safety/Reliability
Smoke
2000-11-03 20:49:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability
JanRwl@A...
2000-11-03 21:03:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability
Mark Peugeot
2000-11-03 21:57:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability
Jon Elson
2000-11-03 23:13:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability
Jon Elson
2000-11-03 23:19:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Safety/Reliability