Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[1]: digitising arm
Posted by
Brian Pitt
on 2000-11-15 01:18:28 UTC
you could use an LVDT to mesure the joint angle of a polar based probe
arm if you built the arm like a mini-backhoe with the LVDT in place of the
hydraulic cylinders but the range of motion would be limited
a high quality potentiometer or two (differential signals) at the joint pivot
might give a better range and there are resolvers and high count encoders
to look at as well
the EMC source includes kinematics for a PUMA 560 polar coordinate
robot arm
Brian
PS; where would you zero an incremental encoder ? ;-)
arm if you built the arm like a mini-backhoe with the LVDT in place of the
hydraulic cylinders but the range of motion would be limited
a high quality potentiometer or two (differential signals) at the joint pivot
might give a better range and there are resolvers and high count encoders
to look at as well
the EMC source includes kinematics for a PUMA 560 polar coordinate
robot arm
Brian
PS; where would you zero an incremental encoder ? ;-)
> This makes sense for a cartesian based probe. Does it make sense for
> the multi-axis (encoders at the joints) digitser? I mentioned earlier
> that loading "arm" kinematics into EMC should work (using just the
> feedback portion of the code).
> Ballendo
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-11-14 23:43:49 UTC
Re[1]: digitising arm
Brian Pitt
2000-11-15 01:18:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[1]: digitising arm
dave engvall
2000-11-15 08:48:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[1]: digitising arm