Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-15 22:25:37 UTC
Alan Marconett KM6VV wrote:
They now DO have a 3-D version of this, without the nasty sparks, too.
I think they have something with different technology with an arm and
a stylus. It probably has better accuracy and resolution than the ultrasonic
devices.
Jon
> Terry, Ballendo, list,That's Scientific Accessories Corp., still in business as of 1-2 years ago.
>
> About twenty+ years ago, we had "sonic digitizers" (2D) for use in
> Radiation Therapy Treatment planning. PHD's would trace tumors an
> patient outlines into a compute to compute the treatment plans. It was
> made by SAC, Scientific American C.. ???, anyway, they also made 3D
> versions, and used a stylus which created a spark that could be heard by
> the "linear microphones" along each axis. Not an arm, but might be an
> interesting approach.
They now DO have a 3-D version of this, without the nasty sparks, too.
I think they have something with different technology with an arm and
a stylus. It probably has better accuracy and resolution than the ultrasonic
devices.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ray
2000-11-15 06:55:19 UTC
Re[2]: digitising arm
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-15 11:11:00 UTC
Re[2]: digitising arm
ballendo@y...
2000-11-15 15:37:05 UTC
Re[2]: digitising arm
ballendo@y...
2000-11-15 19:54:25 UTC
Re[2]: digitising arm
Jon Elson
2000-11-15 22:25:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-16 00:03:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-16 00:33:38 UTC
Re[2]: digitising arm
Ian Wright
2000-11-16 02:26:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm
dave engvall
2000-11-16 08:00:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm
ballendo@y...
2000-11-16 13:13:26 UTC
Re: Re[2]: digitising arm
Anne Ogborn
2000-11-16 16:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: digitising arm