Re: Re:Bobcad 17 Review should be vector something by now??
Posted by
ron ginger
on 2000-12-05 14:45:05 UTC
> Hello,Did you also notice that the first severl replies were not about Bobcad
>
> Am I the only one who noticed the last several messages in this
> thread have NOTHING to do with Bobcad 17 ???
>
> It's been all vector for awhile, but no subject line change??
>
> Ballendo
either, but were picking on the first line or two where he mentioned
QuickCad?
I thought this was a strange thread. First was posted what I though was
a very good review of many aspects of Bobcad. I thought it was a very
well written reivew.
Then follow a bunch of nits about the ability of QuickCad.
The someone asks a question about the discouint price and we get Fred
all over it like a blankt.
Almost no discussion of the points of the review.
ron
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-12-04 22:05:07 UTC
RE: Re:Bobcad 17 Review should be vector something by now??
ron ginger
2000-12-05 14:45:05 UTC
Re: Re:Bobcad 17 Review should be vector something by now??
Smoke
2000-12-05 18:23:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re:Bobcad 17 Review should be vector something by now??