RE:Re: re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2001-01-05 10:13:05 UTC
dave e wrote:
Yep, it makes sense (pun intended). The 'math part' is what CMMs' do
day in,day out...
The 'sense' part is trickier. The problem is accomodating overtravel
and multiple direction sensing. Using a 'standard indicator' means we
have to 'orient' the indicator to the correct directional position. A
small reversible dial test indicator with a switch on the needle(as
you described) will accomodate two directions with overtravel limited
by the indicators' range. For some parts (it has a SHORT arm) it may
work, as long as the 'contact' is always made in the predetermined
direction.
Remember that we are planning to probe a wide VARIETY of objects. And
we "can't" know which part of the sensing sphere(probe tip) will hit
first...
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
>I think Alan said something about using a dial indicator to sense Z.Dave,
>If this has a sensor (switch, optical, etc. ) on the needle then
>contact is indicated (pun intended) by movement of the needle. One
>stores x, y, and z in an array and then post-processes to correct
>sensed postion to real position: much in the same manner as one
>computes the position of contact for a ball end mill when cutting
>surfaces in Z. Hope this makes sense. :-O
Yep, it makes sense (pun intended). The 'math part' is what CMMs' do
day in,day out...
The 'sense' part is trickier. The problem is accomodating overtravel
and multiple direction sensing. Using a 'standard indicator' means we
have to 'orient' the indicator to the correct directional position. A
small reversible dial test indicator with a switch on the needle(as
you described) will accomodate two directions with overtravel limited
by the indicators' range. For some parts (it has a SHORT arm) it may
work, as long as the 'contact' is always made in the predetermined
direction.
Remember that we are planning to probe a wide VARIETY of objects. And
we "can't" know which part of the sensing sphere(probe tip) will hit
first...
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2001-01-03 19:09:24 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-03 20:14:38 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Matt Shaver
2001-01-03 22:55:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
dave engvall
2001-01-04 09:04:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-04 12:56:07 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Lee Studley
2001-01-04 16:30:19 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
dave engvall
2001-01-04 17:12:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-04 21:59:42 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
diazden
2001-01-05 00:09:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 08:38:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 09:04:08 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 10:13:05 UTC
RE:Re: re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Andrew Werby
2001-01-05 10:58:56 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 11:57:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-05 13:04:11 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 14:09:36 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-05 14:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 15:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 16:36:27 UTC
re:Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 16:50:12 UTC
Re: Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?