Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2001-01-03 20:14:38 UTC
Hi Ballendo!
Some comments below:
ballendo@... wrote:
it in my controller. I have been thinking of adding variables. NIST
uses #nnn for a variable name. Not very intuitive (no disrespect
intended as I admire the efforts of NIST; but variable NAMES are a lot
easier to work with). CNCpro has variables, might be same/similar.
What's the standard (ha)? I'm inclined to "do my own", you know how us
programmer types are. ;>)
their probe comes apart! That's twice I've heard the name Renishaw, the
others I kinda know a little.
Alan KM6VV
Some comments below:
ballendo@... wrote:
>Well, now that I have a clue, I can test it. AND/OR, I can incorporate
> Alan M wrote:
> >Curious, I wonder what Otto did, build a library? a TSR?
> >I'll try to contact the Motion Group.
>
> Alan,
>
> To be quite honest, I got tired of trying to get an answer to my
> questions from Otto, so I don't know what he used for 'hooks'. Dave
> Downs used to be the hardware guy at TMG. Good luck.
>
> >Can give me a snippet of gcode to demo these two commands? So any
> >gcode program SHOULD be able to digitizing? I saw a line marked
> >M61 on the MaxNC interface, might have been a typo.
> > G61 X 1.0 Y 0.0
> > G31 ?
>
> Yes,but. That would be correct for any gcode control program written
> to support the 'skip' function. The 'skip' function of Gcode is a
> linear interpolated move. So just think of writing a G01 type
> command. The DIFFERENCE IS, if the input bit being 'watched' (by the
> control) changes state, the motion stops immediately! So
> the 'destination' of the skip command coords need to be far enough
> into the part being digitised to assure contact. The skip function
> will cause a control alarm if the coords are reached WITHOUT 'inout
> at the skip bit'.
>
> G31 x5y3z-1
>
> Most commercial controls have user- accessible variables which
> include the current coordinates. 'Reading' these coords to a file
> completes the act of digitising.
>
> >From memory, I don't know if the MaxNC code is G61, M61, or something
> else...
it in my controller. I have been thinking of adding variables. NIST
uses #nnn for a variable name. Not very intuitive (no disrespect
intended as I admire the efforts of NIST; but variable NAMES are a lot
easier to work with). CNCpro has variables, might be same/similar.
What's the standard (ha)? I'm inclined to "do my own", you know how us
programmer types are. ;>)
>Sounds like MaxNC's spindle taper is different then Sherline's. Unless
> >We never did come up with a digitizer design! You mean we have to
> >BUY one?
> >Alan
>
> I would love to see the list share thoughts on a digitising probe.
> Both by explaining what's out there and how it works (MaxNC, Larken,
> Renishaw, Roland picxa, etc.) and then by working to create a probe
> we all could build!?!
their probe comes apart! That's twice I've heard the name Renishaw, the
others I kinda know a little.
Alan KM6VV
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ballendo
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2001-01-03 19:09:24 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-03 20:14:38 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Matt Shaver
2001-01-03 22:55:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
dave engvall
2001-01-04 09:04:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-04 12:56:07 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Lee Studley
2001-01-04 16:30:19 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
dave engvall
2001-01-04 17:12:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-04 21:59:42 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
diazden
2001-01-05 00:09:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 08:38:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 09:04:08 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 10:13:05 UTC
RE:Re: re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Andrew Werby
2001-01-05 10:58:56 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 11:57:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-05 13:04:11 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 14:09:36 UTC
Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-05 14:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
Smoke
2001-01-05 15:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 16:36:27 UTC
re:Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-05 16:50:12 UTC
Re: Re: Scanner/Digitizer skip function/probe details?