Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Posted by
thomasm923@a...
on 2001-01-10 19:44:16 UTC
Alan-
One thing that I hear from time to time is that the holding torque of
some of these in-between steps is quite a bit less than in other
steps, resulting in the increased likelyhood of missed steps. From
what you've just explained, it seems to me that there isn't that much
of a decrease... Am I correct in assuming that?
Tom Murray
One thing that I hear from time to time is that the holding torque of
some of these in-between steps is quite a bit less than in other
steps, resulting in the increased likelyhood of missed steps. From
what you've just explained, it seems to me that there isn't that much
of a decrease... Am I correct in assuming that?
Tom Murray
Discussion Thread
beer@s...
2001-01-10 12:41:41 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
thomasm923@a...
2001-01-10 19:44:16 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Mariss Freimanis
2001-01-10 22:02:57 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Tim Goldstein
2001-01-10 22:21:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Mariss Freimanis
2001-01-11 07:50:59 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-11 11:18:35 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Roman Black
2001-01-11 11:22:03 UTC
Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER
Carlos Guillermo
2001-01-12 06:25:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping - a genuine PRIMER