Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Posted by
Roman Black
on 2001-01-11 10:56:28 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "Smoke" <Smoke@5...> wrote:
referring to what is the very best, just my
opinion that if I had to build a high performance
system, optos are the technology I would choose.
It would be the easiest to implement at that
level performance. :o)
-Roman
> Why would you want to charge extra ("high priced commercial system")for
> using opto sensors? The catalog I have lists virtually the sameprice for
> capacivite or inductive proximity sensors AND photoelectric sensors.Sorry if I didn't say that very well! I wasn't
>
> Smoke
referring to what is the very best, just my
opinion that if I had to build a high performance
system, optos are the technology I would choose.
It would be the easiest to implement at that
level performance. :o)
-Roman
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2001-01-07 15:08:08 UTC
Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Bill Phillips
2001-01-08 13:54:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Smoke
2001-01-08 14:43:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
dave engvall
2001-01-08 16:53:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-09 01:33:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-09 10:22:13 UTC
Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Bill Phillips
2001-01-09 13:48:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Bill Phillips
2001-01-09 13:48:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Bill Phillips
2001-01-09 13:48:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-09 14:59:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
dave engvall
2001-01-09 16:00:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-09 17:21:38 UTC
Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-10 02:26:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Roman Black
2001-01-10 07:44:30 UTC
Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Smoke
2001-01-10 09:34:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-10 11:20:38 UTC
Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-10 15:42:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Smoke
2001-01-10 16:09:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-11 02:16:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Smoke
2001-01-11 06:23:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Roman Black
2001-01-11 10:56:28 UTC
Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Bill Phillips
2001-01-11 13:38:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Greg Nuspel
2001-01-11 14:01:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-11 15:18:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)
Ian Wright
2001-01-11 15:20:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizers, Renishaw (for bill phillips)