CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Unlurking

Posted by Jon Elson
on 1999-08-06 22:32:05 UTC
mllmdupr@... wrote:

> From: mllmdupr@...
>
> OK, you got me. Tried to wait until I resolved this one finger typing
> problem. bought linux 5.2 ten months ago to install on a 100 MHZ 486
> DX4 with 32 mb of ram . i have a 1983 vintage supermax with a bandit 2 control that was
> functional until damaged by a roof leak. this machine uses resolvers
> instead of encoders which have a higher resolution than encoders.is EMC as
> well as the servo to go card ever been utilized with resolvers?

Very difficult. There are modules you can buy that convert resolver signals to
quadrature pulses. Otherwise, you can replace the resolvers with shaft encoders.
If your resolvers are shaft type, then I don't think you'd lose any resolution.
I have 1000 cycle/rev encoders on 5 TPI leadscrews, with quadrature
counters reading all transitions, I get 4000 counts/rev, x 5 revs/inch, to give
20000 counts/inch, or .00005" per count.

If you have linear resolvers, then those would be nice to hook to interpolator/
converters.

Jon

Discussion Thread

mllmdupr@x... 1999-08-06 16:52:40 UTC Unlurking Don Hughes 1999-08-06 21:05:57 UTC Re: Unlurking Tim Goldstein 1999-08-06 22:18:51 UTC RE: Unlurking Jon Elson 1999-08-06 22:32:05 UTC Re: Unlurking Don Hughes 1999-08-06 22:36:57 UTC Re: Unlurking