Re: Unlurking
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-08-06 22:32:05 UTC
mllmdupr@... wrote:
quadrature pulses. Otherwise, you can replace the resolvers with shaft encoders.
If your resolvers are shaft type, then I don't think you'd lose any resolution.
I have 1000 cycle/rev encoders on 5 TPI leadscrews, with quadrature
counters reading all transitions, I get 4000 counts/rev, x 5 revs/inch, to give
20000 counts/inch, or .00005" per count.
If you have linear resolvers, then those would be nice to hook to interpolator/
converters.
Jon
> From: mllmdupr@...Very difficult. There are modules you can buy that convert resolver signals to
>
> OK, you got me. Tried to wait until I resolved this one finger typing
> problem. bought linux 5.2 ten months ago to install on a 100 MHZ 486
> DX4 with 32 mb of ram . i have a 1983 vintage supermax with a bandit 2 control that was
> functional until damaged by a roof leak. this machine uses resolvers
> instead of encoders which have a higher resolution than encoders.is EMC as
> well as the servo to go card ever been utilized with resolvers?
quadrature pulses. Otherwise, you can replace the resolvers with shaft encoders.
If your resolvers are shaft type, then I don't think you'd lose any resolution.
I have 1000 cycle/rev encoders on 5 TPI leadscrews, with quadrature
counters reading all transitions, I get 4000 counts/rev, x 5 revs/inch, to give
20000 counts/inch, or .00005" per count.
If you have linear resolvers, then those would be nice to hook to interpolator/
converters.
Jon
Discussion Thread
mllmdupr@x...
1999-08-06 16:52:40 UTC
Unlurking
Don Hughes
1999-08-06 21:05:57 UTC
Re: Unlurking
Tim Goldstein
1999-08-06 22:18:51 UTC
RE: Unlurking
Jon Elson
1999-08-06 22:32:05 UTC
Re: Unlurking
Don Hughes
1999-08-06 22:36:57 UTC
Re: Unlurking