Re:digital cameras

At 12:42 PM 2/16/2001, you wrote:

>another thing to think about is a cheaper camera's 640x480 picture
>may not be that good as a more expensive ones do to its optics...but
>I am not sure about that. I think with photoalley.com if you don't
>like the camera you can return it, so check that out too.
>later

Yes, quite true. That was another reason for going with a better cameras -
better optics.

The quality of the lens is no less important than for a film camera. On
reason for my going with an Olympus as opposed to an electronic company's
camera was that a "real" camera maker is more likely to understand the ins
and outs of the glass!!

I have been pleased to note that the lens quality of my Olympus seems to
exceed the image capabilities under all conditions I've encountered,
meaning that I have not encountered aberration problems or the like.
Regards,
Bradford Chaucer
bradford.chaucer@...