Re: Gates Timing Belts
Posted by
Hugh Currin
on 2001-02-19 11:31:44 UTC
Les, Gary, et al:
At 06:56 PM 2/19/01 +0000, you wrote:
torque at 4000 rpm. This is nearly linear (at lower speeds), it will carry
1.1 HP at 2000 rpm.
being equal, will be bent fewer times going around the pulleys than the
shorter belt. Since the longer belt is flexed fewer times it will last
longer. I think the Mfg adjusts power ratings to account for this.
Hugh Currin
Klamath Falls, OR
At 06:56 PM 2/19/01 +0000, you wrote:
>2. At 4000 rpm, 3mm belts can take about 2.2 horsepower (35 lb-in)Note the 35 lb-in here. This small belt carries 2.2 HP but only 35 lb-in
>BUT this only applies with wide belts and large pulleys.
torque at 4000 rpm. This is nearly linear (at lower speeds), it will carry
1.1 HP at 2000 rpm.
>3. Belt length is also a factor. Shorter belts can't take as muchI've always thought this was for life. A longer belt, everything else
>torque as longer belts. (Don't ask me why, it seems kind of
>unintuitive - but it works).
being equal, will be bent fewer times going around the pulleys than the
shorter belt. Since the longer belt is flexed fewer times it will last
longer. I think the Mfg adjusts power ratings to account for this.
Hugh Currin
Klamath Falls, OR
Discussion Thread
Gary.Rose@c...
2001-02-19 10:56:44 UTC
Re: Gates Timing Belts
Hugh Currin
2001-02-19 11:31:44 UTC
Re: Gates Timing Belts
Les Watts
2001-02-19 11:40:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gates Timing Belts
ballendo@y...
2001-02-20 20:49:15 UTC
Re: Gates Timing Belts