Re:Scopes
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2001-03-25 16:37:32 UTC
Hi Jon, Mariss,
Yeah, I thought '465 sounded familiar. There's one at work! Nice
'scope.
Good point Mariss, I haven't seen that many, all have been fine. We do
have an expensive, 4 channel digital 'tek, and IT's got plenty of
problems.
Jon, on the '465, I doubt if you could go wrong with one in good shape.
Alan KM6VV
mariss92705@... wrote:
Yeah, I thought '465 sounded familiar. There's one at work! Nice
'scope.
Good point Mariss, I haven't seen that many, all have been fine. We do
have an expensive, 4 channel digital 'tek, and IT's got plenty of
problems.
Jon, on the '465, I doubt if you could go wrong with one in good shape.
Alan KM6VV
mariss92705@... wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion the 465 was the best general purpose scope Tektronix
> ever made. It had excellent writing speed and focus. Its weakness was
> the voltage attenuators. These were easily prone to mechanical
> malfunction and rendered an otherwise working scope into junk because
> of the expense in replacing them.
>
> Mariss
Discussion Thread
Bradford Chaucer
2001-03-25 06:27:45 UTC
Re:Scopes
mariss92705@y...
2001-03-25 09:35:35 UTC
Re:Scopes
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-25 16:37:32 UTC
Re:Scopes
Jon Elson
2001-03-25 22:16:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Scopes