CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Reliable information - was Automatic boring head?

Posted by hexagon@o...
on 2001-05-06 05:12:06 UTC
--- Well, I think I would rather get information a good engineering
book than on line. Most books are joint endevours and pass through
several pairs of hands befor printing. I am not talking about the
hobby magazine type of publications where all sorts of crazy things
are suggested to compensate for lack of proper equipment.
I would not want to serve an "online apprenticeship", just take a look
at one of the "stuck collet" replies just listed. I cannot see much
difference between that and under water glass cutting, except perhaps
that glass cutting is a less costly experiment if it fails!
Terry
In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Ian Wright" <Ian@i...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <hexagon@o...>
> > Sorry if I upset you but I have found most lists to be a very
> > unreliable source of information, it is quicker to search out and
read
> > a good manual written by an expert than to sort out the wheat from
the
> > chaff offered on line. I think if a person commits himself to
print
> > and charges for it, the chances of it being useful information is
> > petty good.
>
> Now, I too don't want to upset anyone but...... ;o)...
> you obviously don't read the same books as I do or are maybe not as
critical
> of their content. In my field of watchmaking and also amongst a good
number
> of engineering books I have read, there is very little 'original'
material.
> Rather, the works of earlier writers has been plagiarised with
obvious
> errors perpetuated and 'old wives tales' incorporated so that many
of the
> books are, at best, unreliable, and, at worst, downright dangerous.
The kind
> of thing I am talking about is the assertion which appears in
several
> supposedly respected texts, that you can cut glass with scissors
provided it
> is done under water! This is obviously an extreme example but many
of the
> well known texts contain errors which can be traced back to earlier
works,
> often originating in a mistranslation of a foreign text. Granted,
there are
> some useful modern books which are written by knowledgeable and
practical
> people but far too many are at best, theorists, and, at worst, just
want to
> make a living from writing. Sorting your way through this morass of
books
> can be far more time consuming than accessing this list - unless, of
course,
> you are prepared to take everything at face value.
> At least on the list you are fairly sure that the contributors are
practical
> people and, amongst them there are true 'experts' in a number of
fields.
> Within the space of a couple of days, any problem is likely to get
several
> different solutions offered and you can then sort these out
yourself. They
> will probably all work in certain circumstances although they may
not all
> fit your situation of cost frame but then the same would surely
apply to
> 'book learning'. Any offerings which are obviously unworkable will
almost
> certainly be condemned quite rapidly by those who have 'been there -
done
> that'.
> All lists have a broad mixture of talents and personalities with
less
> contributors than 'monitors' and this is unfortunate as those who
sit on the
> sidelines could often make very valuable contributions, even if
these are
> only in a very small, specailised area.
> All forms of learning have their place and I, for one, have gained a
lot of
> valuable information and assistance from this list. My interests are
perhaps
> more esoteric than most and I can only comment on subjects which
are,
> perhaps, peripheral to the core of the list, nevertheless, any
contribution
> I do make is carefully considered and given the same weight as I
would
> expect to place in a published book. You never know what use will be
made of
> the information you post to the internet and I was made aware a
little while
> ago of a substantial part of one of my postings to another list
appearing as
> an unattributed quote in an article in a well-known New York
newspaper!
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk

Discussion Thread

Ian Wright 2001-05-05 01:11:27 UTC Reliable information - was Automatic boring head? hexagon@o... 2001-05-06 05:12:06 UTC Re: Reliable information - was Automatic boring head? Ian Wright 2001-05-06 09:54:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Reliable information - was Automatic boring head?