Re: SERVOs & EMC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-09-20 16:11:35 UTC
Bertho Boman wrote:
doesn't seem bad. Unfortunately, putting resistors in
the ground legs of the lower transistors doesn't always do the
trick, as there is circulating current in the motor's inductance,
and you need to know which way the motor current flows, too.
I think the switching approach would be a good deal
more complicated, and I don't see how the current's direction
would be measured, in both cases (transistor on, and transistor
off).
Hall effect sensors have a lot of drift and hysteresis, which would
be undesirable. This circuit works VERY well, and I'm totally
happy with it.
Jon
> From: Bertho Boman <boman@...>Well, the circuit I have now requires only 9 components, which
>
> Very good description Jon!
>
> Re Floating current sense resistor:
>
> You might want to consider two grounded current gain resistors, one in each leg of the bridge and an analog switch to monitor
> the current going forward or reverse. It would eliminate the difficult floating measurement. I have also seen halleffect
> current sensors for this application.
doesn't seem bad. Unfortunately, putting resistors in
the ground legs of the lower transistors doesn't always do the
trick, as there is circulating current in the motor's inductance,
and you need to know which way the motor current flows, too.
I think the switching approach would be a good deal
more complicated, and I don't see how the current's direction
would be measured, in both cases (transistor on, and transistor
off).
Hall effect sensors have a lot of drift and hysteresis, which would
be undesirable. This circuit works VERY well, and I'm totally
happy with it.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Arne Chr. Jorgensen
1999-09-20 01:22:26 UTC
SERVOs & EMC
Jon Elson
1999-09-20 12:16:28 UTC
Re: SERVOs & EMC
Bertho Boman
1999-09-20 13:36:50 UTC
Re: SERVOs & EMC
Jon Elson
1999-09-20 16:11:35 UTC
Re: SERVOs & EMC