Re: RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Posted by
Ray
on 2001-07-11 04:55:59 UTC
From: Jon Elson <elson@...>
Subject: Re: RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
He is also correct about the hacked code. I wrote a little Tcl/Tk code that
will take g-code files and treat them as subroutines within a master
program. It is not exactly easy to use but it's under the scripts menu if
you are using tkemc.
required enforcement of the language. RS is an acro-whatever for
recommended standard. I doubt that our vote will carry much weight with
the big control making companies!
Perhaps we should see this an an economic opportunity and write
dictionaries and sell translators.
Ray
Subject: Re: RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
>Alan Marconett KM6VV wrote:Jon is correct that EMC's g-code - RS-274NGC - does not support subroutines.
>
>> Hi Ray, Tim,
>>
>> I've been studying the recent posts on stopping, I.E. M02 & M30, and
>> also reading CNCpro's, and FlashCut's doc's. I under stand that there
>> are variations in Gcode!
>EMC does not now have subroutines. This is a major drawback for those
>writing code by hand. I think there has been a TCL hack that makes the
>GUI trick the system into doing subroutines.
He is also correct about the hacked code. I wrote a little Tcl/Tk code that
will take g-code files and treat them as subroutines within a master
program. It is not exactly easy to use but it's under the scripts menu if
you are using tkemc.
>> I was hoping to find a common denominator (majority vote) for doingAnd even if it was a part of the RS-274 documents, there was no
>> subroutines. ;>)
>>
>> A common method of doing variables would also be nice!
>If it wasn't part of the RS-274D spec, then every control manufacturer
>was left to figure out a syntax on his own.
required enforcement of the language. RS is an acro-whatever for
recommended standard. I doubt that our vote will carry much weight with
the big control making companies!
Perhaps we should see this an an economic opportunity and write
dictionaries and sell translators.
Ray
Discussion Thread
jguenther@v...
2001-07-09 08:46:59 UTC
Why can't I re-run this program?
Tim Goldstein
2001-07-09 09:22:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why can't I re-run this program?
jguenther@v...
2001-07-09 09:34:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-09 10:17:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why can't I re-run this program?
Ray
2001-07-10 07:38:51 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-10 10:20:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-10 13:59:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-10 20:54:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Ray
2001-07-11 04:55:59 UTC
Re: RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
John Guenther
2001-07-11 05:15:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Smoke
2001-07-11 08:09:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-11 10:49:29 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-11 12:11:59 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-11 20:20:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-11 20:32:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-11 21:49:11 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Ray
2001-07-12 06:50:59 UTC
Re: Why can't I re-run this program?
Ray
2001-07-12 06:51:14 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Jon Elson
2001-07-12 11:11:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-12 12:39:47 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-12 13:25:00 UTC
RE: Why can't I re-run this program?