Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport serial numbers Was: scraping beds for long tables
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-07-18 22:12:24 UTC
> >Yes, that is about how I figured it should be.
> > There are some discrepancies in the list, in the 1941 - 1943 range.
> > It may have happened during scanning of a page, or manual entry,
> > where the most significant digit was dropped or entered incorrectly.
> > The number ranges overlap, and the starting number for 1942 even
> > goes backward from 1941! Otherwise, this is a fine bit of
> information.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> Jon,
> Thanks for pointing this out.
> I looked on my original list and it's the same. If however you look
> at the list 1941 finishes at 1549 and '42 starts at 560 I think this
> is a typo and should be 1550 because if you then look at the finish
> of '42 it's 2943 whereas the start of '44 is 944. They have obviously
> missed the 2 off the front.
> I checked the two Adcock and Shipley bridgeport I have and they areAh, these numbers must start a LOT later than the US bridgeports, if
> listed as J350 and J1695
> The J350 is a 2J variable speed with the electronic power feed that
> sticks back at about 45 degrees and has chrome ways.
> The J1695 which I though was an earlier machine is identical except
> that it has the mechanical gearbox power feed. The J1695 has a
> varispeed head on it numbered JB 13678.
> I think I'll try A&S to see if they have any numbers for the licensed
> machines.
J350 has the electronic power feed. The gearbox power feed may have
been added later. (It usually requires the X leadscrew to be changed,
if there is any fudging there, it pretty much assures it was added later).
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2001-07-18 22:12:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport serial numbers Was: scraping beds for long tables