Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse
Posted by
Weyland
on 2001-09-27 16:10:11 UTC
From: "Paul" <Paul.Corner@...>
But it's been more than a day, so I've forgotten.
If "0x200" is equal to 512 (the first set of jumpers) then yes.
As for using "smdromod" in the ini file, yes I am.
Thanks,
Weyland
>Okay, someone explained this to me once before.
> First thing to check is the board base address - This must be set to 0x200
> (hex) before EMC will see it.
> Second, are you using smdromod in your ini file ?
But it's been more than a day, so I've forgotten.
If "0x200" is equal to 512 (the first set of jumpers) then yes.
As for using "smdromod" in the ini file, yes I am.
> The third thing to check regards a bug in dro.c - But I can check that outDefinitely wanna know what this is.
> from here later this evening.
Thanks,
Weyland
Discussion Thread
Weyland
2001-09-27 12:19:58 UTC
beating a dead horse
Paul
2001-09-27 12:36:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse
Weyland
2001-09-27 16:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse
Jon Elson
2001-09-27 22:22:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse
Paul
2001-09-28 12:58:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse
M. SHABBIR
2001-09-30 03:40:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] beating a dead horse