Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-10-05 22:49:53 UTC
Dan Statman wrote:
step is .00001" on your machine, you don't care. If you are working to
high accuracy, .001" tolerance is required, and a full step equals .0005"
you may start to be concerned. If a full step is .001", then a half-step worth
of error is .0005". Add an error of .0005" on one side of a part, and an
additional error of .0005" on the other side, and you are now +/- .001"
JUST due to errors in the stepper motors' holding position, ignoring
all other sources of error. That means, you are already hopelessly
outside the .001" error you wanted to hold. obviously, such a machine
is not well suited for precision work.
Understanding all the sources of error is the first thing you need to do
when designing or evaluating a machine. After understanding the errors,
you can then judge whether the machine will perform acceptably for your
needs, or not!
Practically, this is probably a small error in most machines. Thermal
expansion of dissimilar metals, errors in leadscrews, wear, bowing
and out-of-square condition of the ways are probably larger concerns
in many smaller and low cost machines, and backlash of old Acme
leadscrews swamp all other errors.
Jon
> It is a typo, they meant to say brake, not break. A mechanical brake willOh, it DOES! Now, if you are machining to modest accuracies, and a full
> hold until its mechanical limit is exceeded, but the shaft of the stepper
> motor acts as a torsonal spring and deflects a certain rotational amount
> which causes a movement before the torque rating is exceeded. I am not sure
> any of this makes a damn bit of difference when it comes to CNC machining.
step is .00001" on your machine, you don't care. If you are working to
high accuracy, .001" tolerance is required, and a full step equals .0005"
you may start to be concerned. If a full step is .001", then a half-step worth
of error is .0005". Add an error of .0005" on one side of a part, and an
additional error of .0005" on the other side, and you are now +/- .001"
JUST due to errors in the stepper motors' holding position, ignoring
all other sources of error. That means, you are already hopelessly
outside the .001" error you wanted to hold. obviously, such a machine
is not well suited for precision work.
Understanding all the sources of error is the first thing you need to do
when designing or evaluating a machine. After understanding the errors,
you can then judge whether the machine will perform acceptably for your
needs, or not!
Practically, this is probably a small error in most machines. Thermal
expansion of dissimilar metals, errors in leadscrews, wear, bowing
and out-of-square condition of the ways are probably larger concerns
in many smaller and low cost machines, and backlash of old Acme
leadscrews swamp all other errors.
Jon
Discussion Thread
palrajas@a...
2001-10-05 16:32:47 UTC
stepper motor accuracy
Dan Statman
2001-10-05 17:20:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
ccs@m...
2001-10-05 17:26:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
Jon Elson
2001-10-05 22:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
Jon Elson
2001-10-05 22:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
Ian Wright
2001-10-06 02:16:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy
machines@n...
2001-10-06 02:22:47 UTC
Re: stepper motor accuracy
Ian Wright
2001-10-06 02:29:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: stepper motor accuracy
ccs@m...
2001-10-06 05:17:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] stepper motor accuracy