Re: Parallel Port Interface
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2001-11-03 12:37:36 UTC
Hi Doug,
the '132 is a NAND, but I think you're confusing it. Gnd a NAND input,
and you get nothing through. Tie an input HI, and the signal goes
through INVERTED. Now a '136 is an EXCLUSIVE-OR gate, and work similar
to what you're saying. Perhaps that's the one you're thinking of?
Alan KM6VV
Doug Fortune wrote:
the '132 is a NAND, but I think you're confusing it. Gnd a NAND input,
and you get nothing through. Tie an input HI, and the signal goes
through INVERTED. Now a '136 is an EXCLUSIVE-OR gate, and work similar
to what you're saying. Perhaps that's the one you're thinking of?
Alan KM6VV
Doug Fortune wrote:
>
> currinh@... wrote:
> >
> > For what it is worth, here's what I've done.
> >
> > I designed and built the opto-isolation circuit (quite
> > an accomplishment for me) and this worked well. However,
> > it inverted the signals and EMC did not like this.
> >
>
> I think I suggested this idea before (using single ended signals,
> buffering them to higher strength, and using a Schmitt trigger
> type device (with built in hysteresis):
>
> Using a 74LS132 quad 2-input positive NAND Schmitt trigger TTL
> chip (under a buck), you can use it this way:
>
> As it is a NAND, if you hook one input up to GND and the other
> input to your signal (and I am presuming this chip is right next
> to the encoder, for buffering the signal down to your driver/PS
> box), then you get:
> - the buffering
> - Schmitt trigger hysteresis (good for noise reduction)
> - the signal is NOT INVERTED.
>
> However, if you do want the signal inverted (to fix the problem
> above where EMC, or some other program, doesn't like it some
> particular way) hook one input up to +5, and the other input to
> your signal, then you get:
> - the buffering
> - Schmitt trigger functionality
> - the signal is INVERTED.
>
> In fact, since the chip has 4 NAND circuits, you can hook a
> circuit up both ways when you originally solder it together,
> and select what you want (Inverted or Not Inverted) to suit
> the circumstances.
>
> Doug Fortune
> http://www.cncKITS.com
Discussion Thread
Gary.Rose@c...
2001-11-03 07:07:21 UTC
Parallel Port Interface
Art Fenerty
2001-11-03 07:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Parallel Port Interface
currinh@O...
2001-11-03 09:04:22 UTC
Re: Parallel Port Interface
Tim Goldstein
2001-11-03 10:06:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface
currinh@O...
2001-11-03 10:26:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface
Doug Fortune
2001-11-03 10:42:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface
cncdxf@a...
2001-11-03 11:07:13 UTC
Re: Parallel Port Interface
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-11-03 11:40:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Parallel Port Interface
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-11-03 11:46:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Parallel Port Interface
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-11-03 12:37:36 UTC
Re: Parallel Port Interface
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-11-03 12:58:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Parallel Port Interface
Rose, Gary
2001-11-04 14:41:12 UTC
RE: Re: Parallel Port Interface
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-04 18:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Parallel Port Interface
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-04 19:01:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-04 19:03:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-04 19:22:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Parallel Port Interface