Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Posted by
Paul
on 2001-12-13 12:01:52 UTC
Hi Ray, Jon
Having loads of problems with rtai and the 2.4.16 kernel at the moment.
Really hate fsck'ing the file systems manually after a crash (and no, I'm
being crude). EMC running on a RH7.x or Mandrake 8.1 is at the same level of
stability as EMC/RH5.2 was a couple of years ago.
Given time, most of the problems can be ironed out. XFree86 has added a few
new pitfalls with the version 4 releases.
Regards, Paul.
Having loads of problems with rtai and the 2.4.16 kernel at the moment.
Really hate fsck'ing the file systems manually after a crash (and no, I'm
being crude). EMC running on a RH7.x or Mandrake 8.1 is at the same level of
stability as EMC/RH5.2 was a couple of years ago.
Given time, most of the problems can be ironed out. XFree86 has added a few
new pitfalls with the version 4 releases.
Regards, Paul.
On Thursday 13 December 2001 3:19 pm, Ray wrote:
> Not yet. But we will have to tackle these new releases soon. Paul has
> had a number of problems with RTLinux3.0 and the 2.4 kernels. He and Will
> have been working on using rtai rather than nmt real-time.
Discussion Thread
Ray
2001-12-12 17:23:42 UTC
Why EMC
chewy8833
2001-12-12 18:01:29 UTC
Re: Why EMC
Jon Elson
2001-12-12 23:18:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC
Ray
2001-12-13 07:17:21 UTC
Re: Re: Why EMC
Paul
2001-12-13 12:01:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Jon Elson
2001-12-13 23:16:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Michael Shields
2001-12-14 16:16:58 UTC
Re: Why EMC