Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-12-13 23:16:19 UTC
Paul wrote:
when my home machine crashed after a 70-day run (red Hat 5.2) I also ended
up with a kernel that wouldn't boot on my machine at work with Mandrake 8.1
after a crash while trying to fix a print spooler difficulty. That one I never
figured out how to get a standard kernel to boot on, so I FTP'd all my files
off to another machine and then formatted the root partition and reloaded.
Ugh! That took a long time to straighten out.
I am now copying the mail file every once in a while to a safe place.
Jon
> Hi Ray, JonWell, I know about this, as I blew away 6 months of email a couple weeks ago
>
> Having loads of problems with rtai and the 2.4.16 kernel at the moment.
> Really hate fsck'ing the file systems manually after a crash (and no, I'm
> being crude). EMC running on a RH7.x or Mandrake 8.1 is at the same level of
> stability as EMC/RH5.2 was a couple of years ago.
when my home machine crashed after a 70-day run (red Hat 5.2) I also ended
up with a kernel that wouldn't boot on my machine at work with Mandrake 8.1
after a crash while trying to fix a print spooler difficulty. That one I never
figured out how to get a standard kernel to boot on, so I FTP'd all my files
off to another machine and then formatted the root partition and reloaded.
Ugh! That took a long time to straighten out.
I am now copying the mail file every once in a while to a safe place.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ray
2001-12-12 17:23:42 UTC
Why EMC
chewy8833
2001-12-12 18:01:29 UTC
Re: Why EMC
Jon Elson
2001-12-12 23:18:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC
Ray
2001-12-13 07:17:21 UTC
Re: Re: Why EMC
Paul
2001-12-13 12:01:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Jon Elson
2001-12-13 23:16:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Why EMC
Michael Shields
2001-12-14 16:16:58 UTC
Re: Why EMC