Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder location
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-01-15 21:59:11 UTC
ccs@... wrote:
may not be perfect, and so cyclical errors are introduced. With the
encoder on the screw, these errors are eliminated. (I had some sprockets
that were not concentric with the hole. I held them in a 3-jaw chuck
while reboring the hole, which I needed to do anyway, but I have no
idea how concentric they are now.
stretch is a long-term event, so it will not cause servo instability.
It's up to you - but you can't argue that a direct drive with a precision
helical-slit coupler has to be more accurate than putting belts and
sprockets in between.
Jon
> When driving a leadscrew via a timing belt and closed loop servo,You are correct. Also, sprockets may not be totally perfect, belt pitch
> should the encoder go on the motor or on the screw?
>
> I feel like it would be more accurate on the screw, since belt stretch
> would be factored out.
may not be perfect, and so cyclical errors are introduced. With the
encoder on the screw, these errors are eliminated. (I had some sprockets
that were not concentric with the hole. I held them in a 3-jaw chuck
while reboring the hole, which I needed to do anyway, but I have no
idea how concentric they are now.
> However any stretch present might lead to instability, and it wouldIf you have the belts tight enough, there won't be any slip, and the
> be easier to mount it on the motor than on the leadscrew.
stretch is a long-term event, so it will not cause servo instability.
It's up to you - but you can't argue that a direct drive with a precision
helical-slit coupler has to be more accurate than putting belts and
sprockets in between.
Jon
Discussion Thread
ccs@m...
2002-01-15 13:06:20 UTC
Encoder location
vrsculptor
2002-01-15 14:01:20 UTC
Re: Encoder location
Jon Elson
2002-01-15 21:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoder location