Feedback on BDI Parallel Port Set-up
Posted by
Deon Styger
on 2002-02-12 07:43:42 UTC
Hi all,
As promised here is some feedback on my struggle to get EMC up and running.
I have eventually succeeded in getting Linux to detect my parallel port. I
have downloaded a document called parport.txt from http://www.linuxhq.com
which explains a bit more about setting up parallel ports in linux.
I then proceeded to run EMC, but could not get it out of e-stop. Eventually
I noticed that if I set both the limit switch polarities to 1, I get an
error message "minimum hardware limit exceeded". If I however set both the
values to 0, I get a message "maximum hardware limit exceeded". I then set
the minimum limit polarity to 0 and the maximum limit polarity to 1 and that
enabled me to get out of e-stop.
The above happens when the .ini setting for the parallel port is set to 378,
which is the same as set-up in the bios and as detected by linux. If I
however change the address to 278 (which does not exist on my machine), I
get out of e-stop by having both limit switch polarities set to 0. I
therefore make the deduction that the problem is caused by my parallel port
set-up.
I don't know enough about parallel ports (yet) to proceed further with the
faultfinding. Any comments or suggestions?
Deon Styger.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/2002
As promised here is some feedback on my struggle to get EMC up and running.
I have eventually succeeded in getting Linux to detect my parallel port. I
have downloaded a document called parport.txt from http://www.linuxhq.com
which explains a bit more about setting up parallel ports in linux.
I then proceeded to run EMC, but could not get it out of e-stop. Eventually
I noticed that if I set both the limit switch polarities to 1, I get an
error message "minimum hardware limit exceeded". If I however set both the
values to 0, I get a message "maximum hardware limit exceeded". I then set
the minimum limit polarity to 0 and the maximum limit polarity to 1 and that
enabled me to get out of e-stop.
The above happens when the .ini setting for the parallel port is set to 378,
which is the same as set-up in the bios and as detected by linux. If I
however change the address to 278 (which does not exist on my machine), I
get out of e-stop by having both limit switch polarities set to 0. I
therefore make the deduction that the problem is caused by my parallel port
set-up.
I don't know enough about parallel ports (yet) to proceed further with the
faultfinding. Any comments or suggestions?
Deon Styger.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/2002
Discussion Thread
Deon Styger
2002-02-12 07:43:42 UTC
Feedback on BDI Parallel Port Set-up
rehenry
2002-02-12 13:01:50 UTC
Re: Feedback on BDI Parallel Port Set-up