Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO linear scales discussion
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 2002-03-02 20:33:52 UTC
On Saturday 02 March 2002 01:09 pm, you wrote:
sensors. They're available today with 800 cpi resolution in both the X & Y
direction and I'm thinking that if we could skew the travle direction to 45
degrees and combine (somehow) the X & Y outputs we could achieve a resolution
of 800 x 1.414 or 1131 cpi. See:
http://www.semiconductor.agilent.com/cgi-bin/morpheus/home/home.jsp?pSection=Optical+Navigation
Matt
> WHAT WE'RE AFTER HERE IS DIRT CHEAP DRO'S WITH 0.0005I've been thinking about this some and have looked into optical mouse
> READABILTY ... (just to keep the goal in mind).
> Ken Jenkins
sensors. They're available today with 800 cpi resolution in both the X & Y
direction and I'm thinking that if we could skew the travle direction to 45
degrees and combine (somehow) the X & Y outputs we could achieve a resolution
of 800 x 1.414 or 1131 cpi. See:
http://www.semiconductor.agilent.com/cgi-bin/morpheus/home/home.jsp?pSection=Optical+Navigation
Matt
Discussion Thread
Ken Jenkins
2002-03-02 10:09:32 UTC
Re: DRO linear scales discussion
James Owens
2002-03-02 10:32:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO linear scales discussion
Matt Shaver
2002-03-02 20:33:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO linear scales discussion
Jon Elson
2002-03-02 23:06:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO linear scales discussion
a_w_abate
2002-03-03 16:56:13 UTC
Re: DRO linear scales discussion
Jon Elson
2002-03-03 18:07:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO linear scales discussion