Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-18 09:46:29 UTC
cutsgems wrote:
to double the resolution. The hub needs to be smaller to turn twice as fast
for the same linear movement.
not exactly that. There will be slip between the wire and hub, stretching
of different 'plies' of the wire, and pinching of the hub. All very small
effects, but they add up with a long movement. You can try different
diameters until it comes out right. It shouldn't be very hard to make the
hub a couple thousandths larger than the calculated diameter, and then
test it for error. Take a little off and try again. When you get real close,
decide when to stop.
Jon
> I'd like to add a 3 axis DRO to my mini-mill. I've investigated theI think you went the wrong way. You'd need about a 0.159" diameter hub
> Calareo/Wholesale tool import digital machine scales & readout box,
> nearly $500 to cover all three axis. So what I had in mind was some
> encoders from US Digital, something like 2000 PPR?? to get 0.0005"
> resolution, use a simple wire under tension wrapped around the axle of
> the encoder to convert the linear motion to rotary. Use an old laptop
> & printer port & available software for the readout.
>
> My questions are the mechanics for the encoder.
> Would a 1000 PPR encoder give me the resolution required if I used
> 0.6369" diameter hub on the encoder as opposed to a .3183 diameter hub
> which would only yeild a .001" resolution. Or am I better off using a
> 2000 PPR encoder with the .3183 hub? (The .3183 is a rough calculation
> required to convert 1" of travel into 1 rev on the encoder).
to double the resolution. The hub needs to be smaller to turn twice as fast
for the same linear movement.
> Secondly, when calculating the hub diameter, how do I account for theYes, I would suspect it is very close to 1/2 the diameter. but, it is probably
> wire diameter in the calculation? Is it 1/2 the wire diameter +/- the
> hub diameter???? Thanks.
not exactly that. There will be slip between the wire and hub, stretching
of different 'plies' of the wire, and pinching of the hub. All very small
effects, but they add up with a long movement. You can try different
diameters until it comes out right. It shouldn't be very hard to make the
hub a couple thousandths larger than the calculated diameter, and then
test it for error. Take a little off and try again. When you get real close,
decide when to stop.
Jon
Discussion Thread
cutsgems
2002-03-18 07:53:33 UTC
Building A Cheap DRO
Dan Mauch
2002-03-18 08:16:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
Jon Elson
2002-03-18 09:46:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
Art Eckstein
2002-03-18 14:06:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
Raymond Heckert
2002-03-18 19:47:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
deanc500
2002-03-18 21:11:51 UTC
Re: Building A Cheap DRO
Russell Shaw
2002-03-18 21:40:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
catboat15@a...
2002-03-18 21:41:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Building A Cheap DRO
Art Eckstein
2002-03-19 03:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
j_d_guenther
2002-03-19 08:59:59 UTC
Re: Building A Cheap DRO
Jon Elson
2002-03-19 09:32:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
Art Eckstein
2002-03-19 15:39:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Building A Cheap DRO
richiemcb
2002-03-19 19:24:18 UTC
Re: Building A Cheap DRO
Jerry Biehler
2002-03-19 19:24:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Building A Cheap DRO