CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340

Posted by mariss92705
on 2002-05-01 14:19:55 UTC
Hi,

The G420 is a 3-phase brushless DC servodrive. In all other specs it
is the same as a G320.

I have got a few dozen hours of running time in on the prototype.
Right now it functions just like the G320 except there is a noticable
discontinuity or "tick" on every Hall sensor edge (every 60 degrees).
This is something I would like to attenuate or eliminate altogether.

One promising idea that has ocurred to me is to phase lock a ramp
function off of the hall sensor edges. This ramp then would be used
as an attenuation function for the "off" winding. Rather than
abruptly switching a winding "off" or "on", the current would be
gradually applied or removed, eliminating the discontinuity. The
behavior should then approach what one would expect from a
sinusoidally commutated motor.

I have a breadboard started.

Mariss

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "kdoney_63021" <kdoney_63021@y...> wrote:
> What is the difference between the 320 and 340 model of Gecko's
> drivers.

Discussion Thread

kdoney_63021 2002-05-01 13:21:21 UTC Gecko 320 VS. 340 mariss92705 2002-05-01 14:19:55 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 wayne_j_hill 2002-05-01 21:17:21 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 William Scalione 2002-05-01 21:42:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 Jon Elson 2002-05-01 22:14:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 Nicolas Benezan 2002-05-02 07:33:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 mariss92705 2002-05-02 09:52:21 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340