CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340

on 2002-05-01 21:42:49 UTC
Mariss

Reread the subject line, I think he was asking the difference
between the 320 and 340 not the 420

Bill

Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340


> Hi,
>
> The G420 is a 3-phase brushless DC servodrive. In all other specs it
> is the same as a G320.
>
> I have got a few dozen hours of running time in on the prototype.
> Right now it functions just like the G320 except there is a noticable
> discontinuity or "tick" on every Hall sensor edge (every 60 degrees).
> This is something I would like to attenuate or eliminate altogether.
>
> One promising idea that has ocurred to me is to phase lock a ramp
> function off of the hall sensor edges. This ramp then would be used
> as an attenuation function for the "off" winding. Rather than
> abruptly switching a winding "off" or "on", the current would be
> gradually applied or removed, eliminating the discontinuity. The
> behavior should then approach what one would expect from a
> sinusoidally commutated motor.
>
> I have a breadboard started.
>
> Mariss
>

Discussion Thread

kdoney_63021 2002-05-01 13:21:21 UTC Gecko 320 VS. 340 mariss92705 2002-05-01 14:19:55 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 wayne_j_hill 2002-05-01 21:17:21 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 William Scalione 2002-05-01 21:42:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 Jon Elson 2002-05-01 22:14:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 Nicolas Benezan 2002-05-02 07:33:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340 mariss92705 2002-05-02 09:52:21 UTC Re: Gecko 320 VS. 340