Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-06-09 13:56:41 UTC
bjammin@... wrote:
dominant, especially in post WW-II machines. And, buyers know to ask for the
standard tapers, too!
Jon
> At 07:00 AM 6/9/02 +0000, you wrote:Oh, no arguments there! Definitely, over time, standard tapers have become
> >Most machine makers would try to sell machines to the newbies
> >with proprietary tapers, and every maker had several of their
> >own confounding tapers, as well as the established ones.
> >Just like software incompatibility, it locks you into one source
> >for tooling.
>
> That's a stretch. If so, no tooling would be standard. What really happened
> is that these tapers originated when there weren't standards, nor were
> machine makers so much in touch. Hence at different times and sometimes
> widely separated locations, they devised their own out of necessity. For
> example, Jarno is Scandinavian, B&S and Jacobs are American. But if you
> look at the tooling industry as a whole, over time you see that they have
> tried to make things more universal.
dominant, especially in post WW-II machines. And, buyers know to ask for the
standard tapers, too!
Jon
Discussion Thread
John
2002-06-08 23:04:42 UTC
Spindle dimensions & tapers
Jon Elson
2002-06-08 23:44:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
bjammin@i...
2002-06-09 03:55:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
Jon Elson
2002-06-09 13:56:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-09 14:46:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
Bill Vance
2002-06-09 15:37:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers
imserv1
2002-06-09 19:38:39 UTC
Re: Spindle dimensions & tapers
Jon Elson
2002-06-09 22:08:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Spindle dimensions & tapers