Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Router - Belt or Ballscrews
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-06-13 20:31:44 UTC
In a message dated 13-Jun-02 18:06:09 Central Daylight Time,
rainnea@... writes:
"belt drive" may be marginally OK for woodworking (NEVER for metalworking!).
The REASON you don't see commercial routers using [belts] is, it is NOT
ideal! Screws may be expensive, but it's the "right way to go"! A hand-saw
and a framing square and pencil cost less than even a "junky" radial-arm saw,
but the latter will do MUCH finer work, faster, won't it??? (Just a dum'
example of what I'm getting at).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
rainnea@... writes:
> Given the large price difference, the belt driven units seem prettyLotta "IF's" ! ! ! If the construction precision is fine as possible,
> good, but are they any good for a router ? I don't see commercial
> routers using them, but the specs seem ok on paper.
"belt drive" may be marginally OK for woodworking (NEVER for metalworking!).
The REASON you don't see commercial routers using [belts] is, it is NOT
ideal! Screws may be expensive, but it's the "right way to go"! A hand-saw
and a framing square and pencil cost less than even a "junky" radial-arm saw,
but the latter will do MUCH finer work, faster, won't it??? (Just a dum'
example of what I'm getting at).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
rainnea
2002-06-13 16:04:45 UTC
Router - Belt or Ballscrews
Bob Campbell
2002-06-13 16:13:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Router - Belt or Ballscrews
turbulatordude
2002-06-13 17:25:24 UTC
Re: driving a Router - Belt or Ballscrews
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-13 20:31:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Router - Belt or Ballscrews
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-13 20:38:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: driving a Router - Belt or Ballscrews