Re: Re: Close loop steppers
Posted by
Leslie Watts
on 2000-01-17 14:05:45 UTC
beer@... wrote:
with the motors I just got.
Inertia match is good, about 3/1 except for z. Feed rate is very
high though- about 10x that of a typical mill. Cutting forces are
very low, only a few pounds.
Slipped steps are more a concern of bad programming, running
into something, or damaged/worn cutting tools. And I know that
will happen.
its capabilities. And whether he sells the source code. I guess
he is doing everything with one parallel port so there may be
no place for encoder inputs. One could use the port interrupt from
external counter data to do his pause perhaps. Is his software
good stuff?
Anyway I just see steppers as low speed brushless motors with some
torque cogging. Enough microstepping and you just have the makings
of a nice smooth servo. Mine are just half step though so
the general case of filtered encoder feedback is way too slow.
But the things You and Arne are talking about is non-linear
processing and could provide some protection and be stable
even though they are not suitable for all motions.(in my case)
That is why I am considering step recovery in non-cutting
parts of the cycle only.
Les
--
Leslie M. Watts
ITW Advanced Technology Group
(847)657-4559
http://www.netcom.com/~leswatts/leswp.html
> I don't think a "proper" stepper system should lose steps. If it does,Agreed. with 3000 in-oz for x, 1500 for y and z I have good torque
> it's either because it's not powerful enough or the feed rate is too
> high.
>
with the motors I just got.
Inertia match is good, about 3/1 except for z. Feed rate is very
high though- about 10x that of a typical mill. Cutting forces are
very low, only a few pounds.
Slipped steps are more a concern of bad programming, running
into something, or damaged/worn cutting tools. And I know that
will happen.
>I downloaded CNCPro last night. I would like to talk to Doug about
> When a step pulse came in, a step pulse was immediately issued. The
> box then watched the DRO to see if movement resulted. If there was no
> movement ( as indicated by the DRO ), the CNC software was paused and
> additional steps were issued by the little box until suitable movement
> DID occur. The pause line was released and normal operation continued.
>
> This requires that the CNC software have a "pause" input, as opposed to
> an EStop input. ( Doug Yeager of CNCPro did add such a feature, BTW.)
>
its capabilities. And whether he sells the source code. I guess
he is doing everything with one parallel port so there may be
no place for encoder inputs. One could use the port interrupt from
external counter data to do his pause perhaps. Is his software
good stuff?
Anyway I just see steppers as low speed brushless motors with some
torque cogging. Enough microstepping and you just have the makings
of a nice smooth servo. Mine are just half step though so
the general case of filtered encoder feedback is way too slow.
But the things You and Arne are talking about is non-linear
processing and could provide some protection and be stable
even though they are not suitable for all motions.(in my case)
That is why I am considering step recovery in non-cutting
parts of the cycle only.
Les
--
Leslie M. Watts
ITW Advanced Technology Group
(847)657-4559
http://www.netcom.com/~leswatts/leswp.html
Discussion Thread
Arne Chr.Jorgensen
1999-12-15 23:44:02 UTC
Close loop steppers
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-15 13:02:16 UTC
RE: Close loop steppers
Ian Wright
2000-01-15 13:42:57 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
hansw
2000-01-15 14:58:29 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
Bertho Boman
2000-01-15 20:46:14 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
Jon Elson
2000-01-15 22:42:43 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
Ian Wright
2000-01-16 04:00:39 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
Les Watts
2000-01-16 07:06:33 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-16 14:19:04 UTC
RE: Close loop steppers
Ward M.
2000-01-16 14:36:23 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
David Howland
2000-01-17 09:43:39 UTC
RE: Close loop steppers
Leslie Watts
2000-01-17 14:05:45 UTC
Re: Re: Close loop steppers
Matt Shaver
2000-01-17 15:07:43 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers
WAnliker@x...
2000-01-17 15:43:03 UTC
Re: Close loop steppers