Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppermod vs freqmod
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-07-17 10:19:37 UTC
Tim & Heather Smith wrote:
much difference. At higher speeds, with a mid-speed CPU, or with stepper
drives that don't like ragged step pulses, then freqmod will give MUCH
smoother step pulse trains. This allows you to make the machine move
faster before it starts losing steps.
If you don't need it, freqmod eats up a lot more CPU cycles.
Jon
> Hi people,At lower speeds, with a fast CPU, and tolerand stepper drives, there is not
>
> Would someone mind explaining the practical differences between Steppermod &
> Freqmod when running stepper motors via step/direction.
>
> I have both versions (bdi install) setup on my mill and I can't really
> notice any difference in performance.
> What is the advantage of one over the other. I understand that freqmod uses
> more PC resourses.
much difference. At higher speeds, with a mid-speed CPU, or with stepper
drives that don't like ragged step pulses, then freqmod will give MUCH
smoother step pulse trains. This allows you to make the machine move
faster before it starts losing steps.
If you don't need it, freqmod eats up a lot more CPU cycles.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tim & Heather Smith
2002-07-17 02:07:43 UTC
Steppermod vs freqmod
Jon Elson
2002-07-17 10:19:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppermod vs freqmod
Ray Henry
2002-07-17 11:59:58 UTC
Re: Steppermod vs freqmod