Re: Gecko minimum encoder specifications.
Posted by
mariss92705
on 2002-09-12 11:03:23 UTC
Hi,
We have run the G320 with encoders that range from 50 lines to 5,000
lines, the latter being a really fine Canon laser encoder. At the low
end the gain and damping has to be set relatively high.
If 50 lines is still to high of a line count, you can use the pulse
multiplier board (G902) that can bring the effective line count down
to 5 which should be enough; 2,000 steps per second would get you
6,000 RPM on the motor.
Mariss
We have run the G320 with encoders that range from 50 lines to 5,000
lines, the latter being a really fine Canon laser encoder. At the low
end the gain and damping has to be set relatively high.
If 50 lines is still to high of a line count, you can use the pulse
multiplier board (G902) that can bring the effective line count down
to 5 which should be enough; 2,000 steps per second would get you
6,000 RPM on the motor.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Ray Henry <rehenry@u...> wrote:
>
> Erik
>
> A motor driven with the 3xx series will always dither between two
> adjacent encoder steps. As the steps get larger, you will get more
speed
> and overshoot as it dithers.
>
> IMHO - If you place mechanical components between the motor and the
> encoder in this arrangement, that dither will be multiplied by the
lash
> in the mechanical parts.
>
> One of the stepper motion drivers in the EMC (smdromod.o) will
allow you
> to feed back pulses into the PC using the Kulaga/Mauch dro board.
You
> might consider using one fairly high res encoder on the motor shaft
to
> satisify the 3xx and the linears to feed actual position into the
PC.
>
> Ray
>
>
> > From: "Erik Reikes" <ereikes@r...>
>
> > What adverse effect would using an encoder with a smaller
resolution
> > than stated in the Gecko G320 manual have on its operation? Has
> > anyone tried using a G320 with a servo with less than 200 steps
per
> > rev (800 in quadrature)?
> >
> > The only thing that I can think of is that the PID loop might
become
> > so severely underdamped due to lack of feedback that it could
dither
> > like crazy between widely spaced lines on the encoder.
Discussion Thread
Erik Reikes
2002-09-11 15:31:10 UTC
Gecko minimum encoder specifications.
Ray Henry
2002-09-12 07:02:58 UTC
Re: Gecko minimum encoder specifications.
mariss92705
2002-09-12 11:03:23 UTC
Re: Gecko minimum encoder specifications.