Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-09-18 20:26:30 UTC
In a message dated 9/18/2002 9:32:27 PM Central Standard Time,
jaredts@... writes:
"CNC code" in BASIC!)
I understand some kind of special "patch" is necessary to enable Windows to
OUT to the LPT-1. Don't know. Never even tried.
A stepper motor won't START without "ramping" faster than about 400
steps/second. Even a SLOW one- or two-megahz. clock-rate would enable this
rate, even in a FOR-NEXT loop in BASIC!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
jaredts@... writes:
> What operating system would allow me to get the most bang for my buck--dosJared: In MY opinion, GWBASIC running in DOS is just fine! (I write my own
> or Linux
"CNC code" in BASIC!)
I understand some kind of special "patch" is necessary to enable Windows to
OUT to the LPT-1. Don't know. Never even tried.
A stepper motor won't START without "ramping" faster than about 400
steps/second. Even a SLOW one- or two-megahz. clock-rate would enable this
rate, even in a FOR-NEXT loop in BASIC!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
J
2002-09-18 19:30:52 UTC
Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
JanRwl@A...
2002-09-18 20:26:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-09-18 20:29:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
bjammin@i...
2002-09-19 05:20:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
Steve Blackmore
2002-09-19 06:14:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pulse Rate/Processor Speed
Ray Henry
2002-09-19 10:15:24 UTC
Re: Pulse Rate/Processor Speed