Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-09-24 11:26:39 UTC
awallin25 wrote:
many thousands of times a second to avoid missing a transition. Much better
to have a counter in hardware than never "looks away", but is dedicated to
wathcing the encoder position.
Take a look at my latest project http://pico-systems.com/univstep.html
it has the encoder counters, plus very smooth step pulse rate generators,
plus the digital I/O for limit and home switches.
Jon
> after milling some mdf with a stepper controlled table I think i needNo. The problem is that the PC would have to sample the encoder signals
> to add feedback(encoders) to eliminate missed steps...
>
> my question is:
>
> would it be possible to hook up the encoders directly to the pc and
> let EMC read them and act accordingly, ie. implement a PID controller
> in (real-time) software ?
many thousands of times a second to avoid missing a transition. Much better
to have a counter in hardware than never "looks away", but is dedicated to
wathcing the encoder position.
> the parallell port pins won't be enough(?), but what other optionsIn general, the serial port is too slow.
> are available ? (serial?)
Take a look at my latest project http://pico-systems.com/univstep.html
it has the encoder counters, plus very smooth step pulse rate generators,
plus the digital I/O for limit and home switches.
Jon
Discussion Thread
awallin25
2002-09-24 10:14:36 UTC
steppers+feedback+emc
Robert Campbell
2002-09-24 10:29:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
Tim Goldstein
2002-09-24 10:32:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 11:26:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
awallin25
2002-09-25 01:16:26 UTC
Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Michael Holm
2002-09-25 01:24:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Michael Holm
2002-09-25 01:24:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Jon Elson
2002-09-25 09:50:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc