Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Posted by
awallin25
on 2002-09-25 01:16:26 UTC
> With that said if you are having a problem with missed steps...
>during normal
> use the closed loop stepper is not likely to solve the problem.
> I think you need to determine why you are losing steps and fix >the problem
> there.the 3d table is made by isel, so I think it is mechanically OK.
>
I looked at the motors today, and they are isel model
473030, with a torque of 110 Ncm, 2,8V / 4.0A Bidir.
I used a dremel tool with a 3mm mill for milling in MDF.
as I said earlier, using this setup and a program of my own to
drive the table it was constantly losing steps so thats why I
thought feedback would help
experienced guys: can you tell me if milling in mdf and/or
aluminium should be possible with this kind of table ?
is the simplest and best solution for this to just drive the table at
slower speeds? (I did some rough calculations, and with slow
speed the milling of a 3d part(ca500x150x20mm) could take
many hours: 5-10h! with a slow speed, is this
common/acceptable?)
AW
Discussion Thread
awallin25
2002-09-24 10:14:36 UTC
steppers+feedback+emc
Robert Campbell
2002-09-24 10:29:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
Tim Goldstein
2002-09-24 10:32:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
Jon Elson
2002-09-24 11:26:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers+feedback+emc
awallin25
2002-09-25 01:16:26 UTC
Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Michael Holm
2002-09-25 01:24:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Michael Holm
2002-09-25 01:24:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc
Jon Elson
2002-09-25 09:50:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers+feedback+emc