CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders

Posted by JJ
on 2002-10-22 15:54:32 UTC
The company I work for has used resolvers for years. The resolver output
isn't converted to digital, merely fed back to the servo preamplifier,
integrated with a PWM drive signal and tach signal from the motor, then
fed into the servo amplifier. So I suppose it's an open and closed loop.

Regards,
JJ

Be Kind, Be Careful, Be Yourself



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Seddon [mailto:peter@...]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:41 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders
>
>
> We always used rotary brushless resolvers on machine tools which were
> originally developed for the military and hence fairly
> robust. They have one
> other advantage that they are absolute devices for one
> revolution. For most
> applications full travel of the machine will be a few tens of
> revolutions.
> We used the 2500Hz excitation frequency types and managed to
> get reasonably
> good performance and accuracy.
>
> The circuitry for using them is fairly simple using counters
> and comparators
> to energise and extract the position.
>
> Regards Peter
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <w.higdon@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders
>
>
> > I'll try, altough Jon, could probaly do better.
> > A resolver can be a transformer with a 2 or more phase
> > primary. The secondary is inside the primary and is free
> > to move, some are linear, and some are rotary. The
> > Rotary ones usually use sliprings so the secondary can
> > rotate through a full circle (360). Being a analog
> > device the need something to convert them to digital.
> > The chips are rather expensive now, when I worked at
> > Entec, a new board cost between $500 to $1000 depending
> > on accuracy. a encoder can either be a "Absolute
> > encoder" (works just like a synchro with conversion
> > built in). These are usually VERY expensive and limited
> > in resloution. The second kind are "Incremental encoders"
> > these output a series of pulses as they are moved. If
> > they put out a pair of pulses streams with a phase
> > difference between the pulse streams can be used to
> > determine the direction of movement.
> > Now that this is as clear as mud, I'll let Jon or
> > someoone else clarify it.
> > Bill Higdon
> > PS you can convert a syncro machine to a eincremental
> > encoder machine, by replacing the syncro's with suitable
> > encoders. I did one upgrade (conversion)like that while
> > at Entec.
> > > Hi All:
> > > Can any of you explain to me, the differences between
> resolvers and
> > > encoders.
> > > What is the implication for machine performance?
> > > Is a retrofit from resolvers to encoders a worthwhile effort?
> > > When did resolvers go out of favour and why?
> > > I'm casting amorously about, for small CNC turning
> centers, and I've
> heard
> > > the terms mentioned, especially in regard to Hardinge machines.
> > > Mid eighties machines seem to be the transition point
> from the resolver
> > > system to the encoder system.
> > > It looks to me like there is a fair amount of very nice
> old CNC iron
> from
> > > that era out there available for very little
> money...certainly far less
> than
> > > building from scratch or retrofitting a manual
> machine...especially when
> you
> > > consider that the enclosures, the coolant pumps, the
> ballscrews, the way
> > > covers etc, etc are all already there.
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Marcus
> > >
> > >
> > > Addresses:
> > > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > >
> > > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru
> Google.com to reach it
> if you
> > > have trouble.
> > > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I
> consider this as a
> sister site
> > > to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
> subjects, that
> > > are not allowed on the CCED list.
> > >
> > > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN
> BY POSTING THEM.
> DON'T
> > > POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > >
> > > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@...
> > > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@...
> [Moderator]
> > > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > > bill,
> > > List Mom
> > > List Owner
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if
> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this as a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members
> are there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@...
> [Moderator]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ:
> http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this as a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there,
for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........

Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Discussion Thread

Marcus & Eva 2002-10-20 09:27:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders w.higdon@a... 2002-10-20 14:39:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Greg Jackson 2002-10-20 16:37:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Jon Elson 2002-10-20 21:39:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Marcus & Eva 2002-10-20 22:27:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders doug king 2002-10-21 09:36:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Jon Elson 2002-10-21 10:17:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Peter Seddon 2002-10-21 13:42:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders doug king 2002-10-21 15:19:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders JJ 2002-10-22 15:54:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Dave Engvall 2002-10-23 17:02:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Jon Elson 2002-10-23 22:32:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolvers vs Encoders Ray Henry 2002-10-27 15:30:43 UTC Re: Re: Resolvers vs Encoders