Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
Posted by
Ted Robbins
on 2000-02-04 08:41:15 UTC
At 09:28 AM 2/4/00 -500, you wrote:
floating point math cannot be justified in any application where you have
any information about the range of possible decimal point locations, ie;
"scale".
The cost in speed and accuracy is just too high.
Ted
>From: daveland@...microcontroller.
>
>Nobody commented on the math Throughput benchmarks I did on the PC and a
> I was thinking that someone would show me that high math throughput is notguess
>required. I know old time CNC had 8080 CPU's and it did this stuff. I'm sure
>floating point math took 100's of us or Milliseconds on those CPU's. So I
>they used integer math and "picked" some good assumptions for their controls.Charles Moore, who invented the programming language, "Forth", argues that
>
floating point math cannot be justified in any application where you have
any information about the range of possible decimal point locations, ie;
"scale".
The cost in speed and accuracy is just too high.
Ted
Discussion Thread
daveland@n...
2000-02-04 06:28:47 UTC
EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
Ted Robbins
2000-02-04 08:41:15 UTC
Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
Jon Elson
2000-02-04 12:45:08 UTC
Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
James Eckman
2000-02-05 07:42:13 UTC
Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
Jon Elson
2000-02-05 21:07:04 UTC
Re: Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput
James Eckman
2000-02-06 09:46:15 UTC
Re: Re: EHP.. Any comments on micro Throughput