CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern

on 2002-11-15 20:47:57 UTC
True, that 2A at 24V = 48 Watts, but that chip'd better be
at least 90% efficient, and if so, only 4.8 Watts would be
disappated in heat losses.

RayHex

----------
> From: Lee Studley <indigo_red@...>
>
> Hi Gary,
SNIP
>.......... Without it,
> there is impedence to heat flow between the two. 2amps
> at 24v is 48Watts, so put your hand on a 48watt light
bulb for a
> rough analogy( the bulb will probably run cooler I
think). Anyone
> else have ideas?
> -Lee

Discussion Thread

stirlinguy 2002-11-14 19:42:35 UTC L297/L298 board concern Lee Studley 2002-11-14 20:46:55 UTC Re: L297/L298 board concern B Snowden 2002-11-14 21:57:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern JJ 2002-11-15 04:41:51 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern Rose, Gary 2002-11-15 05:51:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern James Cullins 2002-11-15 06:07:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern James Cullins 2002-11-15 06:07:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern JJ 2002-11-15 06:25:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern Rose, Gary 2002-11-15 06:27:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern Dan Mauch 2002-11-15 06:45:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern JJ 2002-11-15 09:51:36 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern Rose, Gary 2002-11-15 11:46:31 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern Raymond Heckert 2002-11-15 20:47:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern Tim Goldstein 2002-11-15 21:04:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern Lee Studley 2002-11-15 21:09:10 UTC Re: L297/L298 board concern Igor Valentic 2002-11-16 14:04:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern