Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern
Posted by
Raymond Heckert
on 2002-11-15 20:47:57 UTC
True, that 2A at 24V = 48 Watts, but that chip'd better be
at least 90% efficient, and if so, only 4.8 Watts would be
disappated in heat losses.
RayHex
----------
at least 90% efficient, and if so, only 4.8 Watts would be
disappated in heat losses.
RayHex
----------
> From: Lee Studley <indigo_red@...>SNIP
>
> Hi Gary,
>.......... Without it,bulb for a
> there is impedence to heat flow between the two. 2amps
> at 24v is 48Watts, so put your hand on a 48watt light
> rough analogy( the bulb will probably run cooler Ithink). Anyone
> else have ideas?
> -Lee
Discussion Thread
stirlinguy
2002-11-14 19:42:35 UTC
L297/L298 board concern
Lee Studley
2002-11-14 20:46:55 UTC
Re: L297/L298 board concern
B Snowden
2002-11-14 21:57:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
JJ
2002-11-15 04:41:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
Rose, Gary
2002-11-15 05:51:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
James Cullins
2002-11-15 06:07:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
James Cullins
2002-11-15 06:07:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
JJ
2002-11-15 06:25:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
Rose, Gary
2002-11-15 06:27:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
Dan Mauch
2002-11-15 06:45:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
JJ
2002-11-15 09:51:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
Rose, Gary
2002-11-15 11:46:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern
Raymond Heckert
2002-11-15 20:47:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-15 21:04:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 board concern
Lee Studley
2002-11-15 21:09:10 UTC
Re: L297/L298 board concern
Igor Valentic
2002-11-16 14:04:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 board concern