Re: Re: CNCPro

Bill,

You might have missed an earlier comment of mine. I asked Doug about
radius comp, saying neither my dad nor I would buy a program that
didn't have it, and wanted to know when it might be implemented.
His response was that he was concerned first with supporting existing
customers and their wants before spending resources adding features
for folks that hadn't bought the program. Radius comp at that time
wasn't
very close to the top. It was on the list at that time however.
I agree with you entirely regarding the added desireability of a greater
feature set. My point is that since he places more weight
on input from paid users, that's where the most effect pressure would
originate.

Jon


WAnliker@... wrote:

> But a lot of no-users will stay that way, until the program has radius
> compensation.
> The way to sell more programs is to have the features that will fill
> non-users needs, then they will buy. Why would a non-user buy on the hopes
> that someday the author MIGHT add the desired features?