CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] a power supply question

Posted by Ron Kline
on 2003-01-07 20:21:30 UTC
I have seen many of these on ebay but stayed away from them because of
the HIGH voltage but this would make sense .

Thanks
Ron K

Tim Goldstein wrote:

>Unlike most motors the Pacific Scientics are now labeled with the
>maximum voltage, not with the traditional rating. I seem to remember
>seeing some older Pac Sci units that had the traditional voltage
>ratings, but now it is the voltage to not exceed asuming you are using a
>current limiting drive.
>
>Tim
>[Denver, CO]
>Sherline products at Deep Discount
>Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
>www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Dumb question here but how are you going to run a 65V motor
>>with a 35V
>>supply .
>>Not much power !!
>>
>>Ron K
>>
>>lum_l wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

lum_l <lum_l@r... 2003-01-07 16:59:44 UTC a power supply question turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-01-07 18:04:50 UTC Re: a power supply question Ron Kline 2003-01-07 18:30:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] a power supply question sparkazoid2001 <mark@c... 2003-01-07 18:31:27 UTC Re: a power supply question jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-07 19:03:54 UTC Re: a power supply question Tim Goldstein 2003-01-07 19:23:33 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] a power supply question turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-01-07 20:16:27 UTC Re: a power supply question Ron Kline 2003-01-07 20:21:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] a power supply question turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-01-08 08:39:32 UTC Re: a power supply question