Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC rotary axes
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-01-22 23:28:36 UTC
Tim Goldstein wrote:
an A axis, ie. parallel to the
X axis. Now, in the simple case, where the Y axis is such that the
spindle (Z axis) ir right over
the A axis, then Z moves directly change the radius. You could easily
make the demand that
Y=0, Z=0 is the origin of the A axis. Then any moves in the Y and Z
axes can be easily converted
into radius from the A axis. Is this what you meant above?
Jon
>My limited understanding is that Art uses the middle of the Z position forI'm not too sure I understand. The way I might want to use this is as
>each move as the current radius. The Z value you enter is just to give Mach1
>a place to track the radius from.
>
>
an A axis, ie. parallel to the
X axis. Now, in the simple case, where the Y axis is such that the
spindle (Z axis) ir right over
the A axis, then Z moves directly change the radius. You could easily
make the demand that
Y=0, Z=0 is the origin of the A axis. Then any moves in the Y and Z
axes can be easily converted
into radius from the A axis. Is this what you meant above?
Jon
>----- Original Message -----
>
>
>>Ahh, indeed, this is what we need, too. But, if the other axes are
>>moving in coordination with
>>the rotary axis, then the radius could be changing throughout the move.
>>
>>
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2003-01-22 23:28:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC rotary axes
rainnea <rainnea@b...
2003-01-23 02:33:06 UTC
Re: EMC rotary axes