Re: Feb 25 build
Posted by
George Fouse
on 2000-02-29 23:00:59 UTC
Well, I downloaded the 2.2.13 version (29Feb2000) and was able to build
it (almost) out of the box (minor flag changes only) under RH6.0.
That's the first time I was able to get EMC to build under the
2.2.13/rt2.0 kernel without a LOT of work! (Although I have to admit
that >95% of that work was my gross unfamiliarity and newby status with
the EMC source!!) At least the demo works OK - don't have anything
hooked up to that pc to really test it. But hey - its a start! Thanks
Fred Proctor and everyone else!
George Fouse
G F I Consulting
Tim Goldstein wrote:
it (almost) out of the box (minor flag changes only) under RH6.0.
That's the first time I was able to get EMC to build under the
2.2.13/rt2.0 kernel without a LOT of work! (Although I have to admit
that >95% of that work was my gross unfamiliarity and newby status with
the EMC source!!) At least the demo works OK - don't have anything
hooked up to that pc to really test it. But hey - its a start! Thanks
Fred Proctor and everyone else!
George Fouse
G F I Consulting
Tim Goldstein wrote:
>--
> From: "Tim Goldstein" <timg@...>
>
> There is a new build of EMC on the NIST site as of today (Feb 29). The txt
> file says it fixes the steppermod problem (But from my experience I would
> say that freqmod is the only way to go if your computer has the horse power)
> and that backlash is re-enabled in freqmod.
> Also some other updates and integration of the work Ray Henry has been doing
> on the interface.
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
Discussion Thread
Darrell Gehlsen
2000-02-29 17:45:36 UTC
Feb 25 build
William Scalione
2000-02-29 18:01:44 UTC
Re: Feb 25 build
Tim Goldstein
2000-02-29 18:52:30 UTC
RE: Feb 25 build
Matt Shaver
2000-02-29 20:15:09 UTC
Re: Feb 25 build
Tim Goldstein
2000-02-29 20:56:42 UTC
RE: Feb 25 build
Darrell
2000-02-29 22:40:55 UTC
Re: Feb 25 build
Darrell
2000-02-29 22:42:39 UTC
Re: Feb 25 build
George Fouse
2000-02-29 23:00:59 UTC
Re: Feb 25 build