Re: Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2003-06-03 09:40:21 UTC
> Often it is easier to implement a bit of electrical handshakingbetween
> machines as opposed to complicate I/O networking.This part makes the most sense. run the machine tool till done.
send an output done signal and wait.
the arm/carrier/part loader then gets a start sinal and then it
starts to run it's program till done, then it waits and the
machineing starts.
simple electrical handshaking. no real need for networking.
I see that programming would almost have to be dependant on materials
more than anything else. unless you have some vast supply of all the
rought stock for all the possible projects, you would be limited to
starting off with some pre-determined blank and machine the heck out
of it.
Dave
Discussion Thread
tkosan
2003-06-03 00:12:16 UTC
Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
glee@i...
2003-06-03 07:43:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
Chris
2003-06-03 07:47:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
David A. Frantz
2003-06-03 08:32:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
Moses McKnight
2003-06-03 09:09:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
turbulatordude
2003-06-03 09:40:21 UTC
Re: Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
Matt Shaver
2003-06-03 20:15:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)
R Petersen
2003-06-04 06:33:11 UTC
Help Testing Stepper Motors
turbulatordude
2003-06-04 07:54:21 UTC
Re: Help Testing Stepper Motors
tkosan
2003-06-04 11:07:53 UTC
Re: Home shop Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM)